Differentiating the domains of dirty work in animal euthanasia
1 online resource (53 pages) : PDF
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
ABSTRACTROBERT MICHAEL BICKMEIER. Differentiating the domains of dirty work in animal euthanasia. (Under the direction of DR. STEVEN G. ROGELBERG)This study distinguished two domains of taint in dirty work empirically and theoretically in terms of involvement with a core dirty task and relationships with individual-level variables. Archival data from a web-based survey of a large sample of animal euthanasia workers (N = 556) from shelters across the United States were analyzed. Physical taint and moral taint significantly related to a hypothesized dirty task (animal euthanasia). Physical taint significantly related to both emotional drain and job satisfaction, whereas moral taint did not significantly relate to either emotional drain or job satisfaction in the presence of physical taint. These relationships were observed while controlling for the effects of a core dirty task indicating that taint has a unique relationship with emotional drain and job satisfaction. The reports of taint and the relationships observed in this study strongly challenge previously held notions that taint and dirty work should be studied prescriptively. Instead, results from this study suggest that dirty work should be studied from the perspective of dirty workers, and the taint of dirty work should be examined across distinct domains.
ANIMAL EUTHANASIABURNOUTDIRTY WORKEMOTIONAL DRAINJOB SATISFACTION
Ruggs, EnricaBeck, Tammy
Thesis (M.A.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2018.
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.
Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.