Correction of the post-necking True Stress-Strain data using Instrumented Nanoindentation
Analytics
190 views ◎124 downloads ⇓
Abstract
The study of large plastic deformations has been the focus of numerous studies particularly in the metal forming processes and fracture mechanics fields. A good understanding of the plastic flow properties of metallic alloys and the true stresses and true strains induced during plastic deformation is crucial to optimize the aforementioned processes, and to predict ductile failure in fracture mechanics analyzes. Knowledge of stresses and strains is extracted from the true stress-strain curve of the material from the uniaxial tensile test. In addition, stress triaxiality is manifested by the neck developed during the last stage of a tensile test performed on a ductile material. This necking phenomenon is the factor responsible for deviating from uniaxial state into a triaxial one, then, providing an inaccurate description of the material's behavior after the onset of neckingThe research of this dissertation is aimed at the development of a correction method for the nonuniform plastic deformation (post-necking) portion of the true stress-strain curve. The correction proposed is based on the well-known relationship between hardness and flow (yield) stress, except that instrumented nanoindentation hardness is utilized rather than conventional macro or micro hardness. Three metals with different combinations of strain hardening behavior and crystal structure were subjected to quasi-static tensile tests: power-law strain hardening low carbon G10180 steel (BCC) and electrolytic tough pitch copper C11000 (FCC), and linear strain hardening austenitic stainless steel S30400 (FCC). Nanoindentation hardness values, measured on the broken tensile specimen, were converted into flow stress values by means of the constraint factor C from Tabor's, the representative plastic strain〖 ϵ〗_r and the post-test true plastic strains measured. Micro Vickers hardness testing was carried out on the sample as well. The constraint factors were 5.5, 4.5 and 4.5 and the representative plastic strains were 0.028, 0.062 and 0.061 for G101800, C11000 and S30400 respectively. The established corrected curves relating post-necking flow stress to true plastic strain turned out to be well represented by a power-law function.Experimental results dictated that a unique single value for C and for ϵ_r is not appropriate to describe materials with different plastic behaviors. Therefore, Tabor's equation, along with the representative plastic strain concept, has been misused in the past. The studied materials exhibited different nanohardness and plastic strain distributions due to their inherently distinct elasto-plastic response. The proposed post-necking correction separates out the effect of triaxiality on the uniaxial true stress-strain curve provided that the nanohardness-flow stress relationship is based on uniaxial values of stress. Some type of size effect, due to the microvoids at the tip of the neck, influenced nanohardness measurements. The instrumented nanoindentation technique proved to be a very suitable method to probe elasto-plastic properties of materials such as nanohardness, elastic modulus, and quasi-static strain rate sensitivity among others. Care should be taken when converting nanohardness to Vickers and vice versa due to their different area definition used. Nanohardness to Vickers ratio oscillated between 1.01 and 1.17.